| Variable | Sub-variable | Sub-variable | Weight Split | Rating 1-10 |
| VISIBILITY OF SITE | To passing vehicles | 15 | 80% | 9 |
| To residents | 20% | 8 | ||
| COMPETITION | Inside trade area | 20 | 70% | 9 |
| Location (in terms of site ) | 30% | 9 | ||
| ACCESSIBILITY Vehicles |
Access from main road | 15 | 50% | 5 |
| (Both directions) | 50% | 7 | ||
| PARKING Facilities |
Parking facilities (Availability / Congestion ) |
10 | 100% | 8 |
| CENTRE TYPE | Neighbourhood / Regional | 10 | 100% | 9 |
| ORIENTATION & PROXIMITY | Residents within trade area | 15 | 100% | 8 |
| TRAFFIC VOLUME | Vehicles | 15 | 100% | 9 |
| COMPLEMENTARY FACILITIES | Offices. other retail | 15 | 100% | 6 |
| Variable | General comments |
| VISIBILITY OF SITE | The site is highly visible from the R573 and Zambezi Drive Residents drive past the site on their way home. |
| COMPETITION | There are small general traders and a Kwikspar to the North. No competitors adjacent to site. |
| ACCESSIBILITY Vehicles | Better future access needed 4-way stop - access from both directions adequate. |
| PARKING Facilities | Adequate parking. |
| ACCESSIBILITY | No transport rank currently offered |
| CENTRE TYPE | Attractive centre to service entire Kameeldrift. |
| ORIENTATION & PROXIMITY | Site is on corner of two main roads. One of these is the main access route to the surrounding area. |
| TRAFFIC VOLUME | High traffic counts past the site because of its location. |
| COMPLEMENTARY FACILITIES | With expansion of the mall, it will need to focus on complementary facilities. The site will have tobecome a new node. |
| Poor | 0-40% |
| Average | 41%-60% |
| Good | 61% - 74% |
| Excellent | 75% - 100% |
| • | Failure in any of the above-mentioned variables can cause the proposed development to under-perform |
| • | Site factors are only one of the success-determining variables; the operator, marketing, logistics etc are other important factors not taken into account in this evaluation. |